[edit] [1]

I love you Tai. --Shazzydiddles 19:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I tend to have that effect on people  Star of Exile talk  19:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] [2]

farming isnt. rather then trashing it (as the build is old), request an archive instead :/ Hydra 11:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

It isn't a hero build, and PUGs don't run it, it's a theorycraft as far as I know. If it is used, like b/p was/is in tombs, please correct me. -- Star of Exile talk  11:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

it was Hydra 11:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Alright then -- Star of Exile talk  11:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Negro, please.

Your pvp char...saw it in RA outspost..."You (On Look Im A Duck):im not a duck" /sigh, bad humor is bad...--Darklɘs McChaosmongɘr 21:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

when was this? I haven't played guild wars for like two weeks -- Star of Exile talk  21:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Tht's actually the most funny thing I have heard for the past 2 weeks. Brandnew. 21:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't like to talk in the RA outpost, because no matter what you say someone ends up turning it into an annoying politics/religion debate, which ends in someone yelling in all caps in favor of their religion/ideology/etc -- Star of Exile talk  21:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

 ;o i am not kidding.....there was a person named "Look Im A Duck" and they said "im not a duck." and i went to go check out your totally hip uzar paeg, and saw ur pvp char... --Darklɘs McChaosmongɘr 21:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't recall saying it, but I might have. Sometimes I say random shit when i'm very bored, as I usually am when I ever get around to playing GW these days -- Star of Exile talk  21:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

should have screened it ;o maybe sum1 hax your acc --Darklɘs McChaosmongɘr 21:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

doubtful. Could have been me -- Star of Exile talk  21:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

but it was like 3 hours ago :> --Darklɘs McChaosmongɘr 21:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I was def not on 3 hours ago -- Star of Exile talk  21:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] yes

i agree we should have one ab team build, but we dont want guide builds :O--Relyk 22:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

The dual physical one isn't a guide, considering the usage is the same no matter what nuker and physicals you take really. -- Star of Exile talk  22:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

And how the hell is a ranger not a physical -- Star of Exile talk  22:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Build:W/any Enduring Scythe Solo UW

Are u supposed to be a w/d/me?--kaboom 10:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

no. -- Star of Exile talk  10:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Really? Cuz its a w/d scythe build with sv and av as variants.--kaboom 10:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, good point, I need to fix that. I'll do it later, i'm in class right now -- Star of Exile talk  11:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Edit of Guide: Ranger

Hi, you reverted my edit to the Ranger guide explaining that 100 armor cuts elemental damage in half under the justification it is "very obvious". ... Erm, to who? Experienced players? But that's not who the guide is targeted towards. It seems like useful information for a newbie, who sees a free "+30 vs. elemental" and just goes "uhm, okay, cool".

Furthermore, if explaining that 100 armor = half damage is too obvious, why are you allowing the guide to explain that Ranger armor adds 1 pip of regen and 70 base armor? Anyone capable of creating a character can figure that out in short order, and much faster than the arbitrary exponential value of increased armor. Anyway, if you could explain your motivation a little better it'd be helpful. Thanks. -- AudreyChandler 22:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I guess I'm just feeling like being irritating. Go ahead and revert me -- Star of Exile talk  22:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, regarding the level only affecting damage dealt, that is not strictly accurate. A level, say, 26 monster's Water Trident would not be halved on a Ranger (assuming only base armor is modifying the situation) because the damage rating for level 26 is 78 instead of 60 (see GuildWiki's damage calc page). That is, even if a level 20 and a level 26 monster both used the same spell at the same attribute level (meaning the raw damage number is the same), the level 26 would still do increased damage. Effectively, outleveling (or underleveling) a target is like automatic armor penetration.

But that may be getting too esoteric for a basic guide. I just threw the level 20 note in to try not to confuse a new player who notices they're taking much more than half damage from, say, boss monster Fireballs. But then again, it may just make things worse. x] -- AudreyChandler 22:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

It would be irrelevant to the Ranger guide >.>--Relyk 22:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I guess i'm wrong then :) thanks, and sorry -- Star of Exile talk  15:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Build:Me/E_Cry_of_Pain_Intensity

I suspect you haven't really paid attention to the build. You commented on the rate page that intensity has too long of a recharge. If that is so, then what is the recharge of intensity WITH Mantra of Recovery?---as the build obviously suggests. Narziss 20:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

12 seconds (with enchanting mod) out of 30 seconds recharge is still too long, you could be bringing more utility or something else more useful. tbh, it's trash anyway. -- Star of Exile talk  21:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] I think

I need to quit PvX. Thoughts? -- Star talk  05:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Smartest thing you have said 17:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] bye for a while

-- Star talk  17:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] regarding PvE theorycrafted teambuilds:

Please stop making them. Yes, I'm leaving PvX, but still. No one ever runs them, ever, they just sit around in the buildspace once they have a category slapped on. Thank you. -- Star talk  19:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

That whole leaving pvx thing didn't last long. FrostytheAdmin 00:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

That was two months ago nub :) -- Star talk  00:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Fairly sure the above comment doesn't state you mentioning a return D: FrostytheAdmin 00:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)